USE OF AN E-TEXTBOOK FOR PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS IN AUTONOMOUS LEARNING OF ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES
PDF

Keywords

autonomous learning
English for specific purposes
ESP e-textbook
pre-service teachers of mathematics

How to Cite

[1]
R. S. Gurevych, N. Y. Dmitrenko, A. I. Petrova, O. A. Podzygun, and N. R. Opushko, “USE OF AN E-TEXTBOOK FOR PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS IN AUTONOMOUS LEARNING OF ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES”, ITLT, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 64–77, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.33407/itlt.v89i3.4941.

Abstract

The research reveals the advantages of using an e-textbook in autonomous learning of the discipline “Foreign Language for Professional Communication (English)” by pre-service teachers of mathematics. The article presents the method of application of the ESP (English for specific purposes) e-textbook “Mathematics”, its structure, and functions. The ESP e-textbook includes learning material of three different levels of language proficiency. Each part contains professional vocabulary and speech situations aimed at forming the necessary skills and abilities in the mathematical field. The authors describe the stages of work with the learning material within a unit of the ESP e-textbook. The necessity of introduction of ESP e-textbooks in the process of learning a foreign language by pre-service teachers of mathematics is justified. The benefits of using the ESP e-textbook by students for autonomous learning are elucidated, and new opportunities for an ESP teacher to structure foreign language classes are outlined in the research. Experimental training with the use of the ESP e-textbook is conducted among pre-service teachers of mathematics at Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsiubynskyi State Pedagogical University (Ukraine), where the ESP e-textbook is considered as an element of the learning environment for professional creative activity and accumulation of knowledge in the conditions of autonomous learning. The study presents and analyzes the results of students’ English proficiency tests, and the survey on the students’ attitude to the use of ESP e-textbooks in the process of autonomous learning of ESP. The analysis of students’ surveys shows the effectiveness and expediency of using the e-textbook by pre-service teachers of mathematics in autonomous learning of English for professional communication. In the paper, some samples of educational activities from the ESP e-textbook “Mathematics” are presented.

PDF

References

A. Conyers, J. Lambert, L. Wong, and H. Jones,“E-book usage: Counting the challenges and opportunities”, Insights, vol. 30, no 2, pp. 23-30, 2017. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1629/uksg.370. (in English)

Y. Abutaleb, “Some universities require students to use e-textbooks”,USA Today, vol. 1,2012. (in English)

Y. Y. Kang, M. J.Wang, and R.Lin, “Usability evaluation of E-books”, Displays, vol. 30, pp. 49-52, 2009. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2008.12.002. (in English)

J. Casey, “Integrating Computers in the Primary Classroom”,The Computing Teacher, vol. 21, pp. 33-36, 1994. (in English)

S. Al-Ali, and A. Ahmed, “E-textbooks in ESL classrooms: are learners on board?”,Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Gulf Perspectives, vol. 12, no.2, pp. 3-22, 2015. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18538/lthe.v12.n2.222. (in English)

R. Brown,“A survey of professor acceptance and use of e-textbooks in higher education”,Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER), vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 219-222, 2013. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.19030/cier.v6i2.7731. (in English)

E. O. Falc, “An assessment of college students’ attitudes towards using an online e-textbook”,Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, vol. 9, pp. 1-12, 2013. (in English)

A. Feldstein, and M. Martin, “Understanding slow growth in the adoption of e-textbooks: Distinguishing paper and electronic delivery of course content”, International Research in Education, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 177-193, 2013. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/ire.v1i1.4071. (in English)

S. O’Hare, and A. Smith, “The customer is always right? Resistance from college students to e-books as textbooks”, Kansas Library Association College and University Libraries Section Proceedings, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 35-41, 2012. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4148/culs.v2i0.1615. (in English)

G. C. Philip, and S-Y. Moon, “An investigation of student expectation, perceived performance and satisfaction of e-textbooks”, Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovation in Practice, vol. 12, pp. 276-298, 2013. (in English)

E. Bruillard, “Textbooks and electronic resources for low secondary schools”, Has Past Passed? Textbooks and Educational Media for the 21st Century (IARTEM), vol. 7, no. 15, pp. 100-105, 2005. (in English)

S. Laketa, and D. Drakulić, “Quality of lessons in traditional and electronic textbooks”, Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 177-127, 2015. (in English)

H. Dundar, and M. Akcayir, “Tablet vs. paper: the effect on learners’ reading performance”, International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 441-450, 2012. (in English)

E. C. Elias, D. C.Philips, and M. E. Luechtefeld, “E-books in the classroom: A survey of students and faculty at a school of pharmacy”, Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 262-266, 2012. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2012.05.009. (in English)

H. J. Lee, C. Messom, and K. A. Yau, “Can an electronic textbook be part of K-12 education?: Challenges, technological solutions, and open issues”,TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 32-44, 2013. (in English)

D. Walling, Designing learning for tablet classrooms. Bloomington, Switzerland: Springer, 2014. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02420-2. (in English)

E. Evans, and J. Po,“A break in the transaction: Examining students’ responses to digital texts”, Computers and Composition, vol. 24, no.1, pp. 56-73, 2007. (in English)

H. Huang, “E-reading and e-discussion: EFL learners’ perceptions of an e-book reading program”, Computer Assisted Language Learning, vol. 26, no.3, pp. 258-281, 2013. (in English)

S. L. Thorne, “Cultures-of-use and morphologies of communicative action”, Language Learning and Technology, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 185-191, 2016. doi:http://llt.msu.edu/issues/june2016/thorne.pdf. (in English)

X. Gu, B. Wu, and X. Xu,“Design, development, and learning in e-Textbooks: What we learned and where we are going”, Journal of Computers in Education, vol. 2, no.1, pp. 25-41, 2015. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40692-014-0023-9. (in English)

H.Vaarala, and J. Jalkanen, “Changing spaces, expanding mindsets: Towards L2 literacies on a multimodal reading comprehension course”, Language Value, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 69-99, 2010. (in English)

I. Liashenko, and L. Hnapovska, “ESP online course as a means of enhancing graduate students’ employability opportunities – case of Sumy state university”,Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, vol. 8,no. 3,pp. 215-230, 2020. doi:https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP2003215L. (in English)

N. Ye. Dmitrenko, Autonomous teaching of professionally oriented English communication of intending mathematics teachers [monograph].Vinnytsia, Ukraine: Tvory, 2020. (in Ukrainian)

N. Dmitrenko, S. Nikolaeva, L. Melnyk, and O. Voloshyna, “Autonomous ESP Learning of Prospective Teachers of Mathematics”, Revista Romaneascapentru Educatie Multidimensionala, vol. 12, no.1, pp. 86-104, 2020. doi:https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/201. (in English)

N. Dmitrenko, A. Petrova, O. Podzygun, and S. Nikolaeva, “Strategies in autonomous learning of professionally oriented English communication”,Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes,vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 527-540, 2021. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP2103527D. (in English)

R. Gurevych, I. Shakhina, and O. Podzygun, “Google Classroom as an effective tool of Smart learning and monitoring of students’ knowledge in vocational schools”, Information Technologies and Learning Tools, vol. 79, no. 5, pp.59-72, 2020. doi:https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v79i5.3651. (in English)

E. Čoupková, “English for Mathematicians. Innovation of Courses – Challenges of a SubjectSpecific Approach”,ACC Journal, vol.36, pp. 58-64, 2014. (in English)

A. Krukiewicz-Gacek, and A. Trzask, English for Mathematics. Krakow: University of Science and Technology Press, 2009. (in English)

T. K. Le, and T. P. Ho, English for Mathematics. Consultant: NguyenVanDong. Ho Chi Minh City University of Education. Foreign Language Section, 2003. (in English)

M. K. McGowan, P. R. Stephens, and C.West, “Student Perception of Electronic Textbooks”,Issues in Information Systems, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 459-465, 2009. doi:https://doi.org/10.48009/2_iis_2009_459-465. (in English)

Ü. Liiber, and J. Rosaare, “The role of the Electronic Textbook in the Use of Active Teaching Methods”, Has Past Passed? Textbook and Educational Media for the 21st Century. IARTEM, vol. 7, no. 15, pp. 106-112, 2005. (in English)

I. Ivić, A. Pešikan, and S. Antić, Guide to a good tutorial. General standards of quality textbooks. Belgrad: Platoneum, 2008. (in English)

A. Kobola, Improving reading in elementary school. Zagreb: Školskaknjiga, 1997. (in English)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2022 Роман Семенович Гуревич, Наталя Євгеніївна Дмітренко, Анастасія Іванівна Петрова, Олена Анатоліївна Подзигун, Надія Романівна Опушко

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.