Keywords
3D modeling
game-based learning
online learning
educational software
interactive learning
PC components
How to Cite
Abstract
Gamified active learning has been shown to improve students' academic performance and engagement while facilitating the establishment of more social connections compared to standard course settings. The objective of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness of gamification within a single course. We developed a gamified environment using 3D technology to enhance the students' comprehension and interest in the course material. Additionally, we assessed students' attitudes towards gamification, including their perception of its usefulness. The study was conducted using an experimental group (class with gamification implementation - selection two forms of gamification, such as 2D and 3D technologies, which can play an important role in achieving the best results) and a control group (class without gamified activities). The results indicated that the use of gamified educational courses can indeed enhance students' academic performance and acquired competencies, providing more diverse learning methods and motivation. A qualitative analysis was conducted to gain insights into students' perceptions of gamified learning. The feedback obtained during the experiment highlighted the positive impact of gamification on students' motivation, enjoyment, and overall satisfaction with the course. Moreover, gamification allowed for easy modifications to cater to different learning needs. The incorporation of 3D modeling technology provides a more engaging and interactive approach to learning, leading to a better understanding of the subject matter and ultimately improving the quality of education.
The conducted experimental study demonstrated a significant in the formation of skills in Computer Science throughout the study process. The utilization of this game-software tool, which employs 3D modeling, is particularly convenient and effective during crisis situations like the COVID-19 pandemic and war, as it facilitates conducting educational activities in a distance format. It also promotes the quick adaptation of students to use IT-technologies in their learning journey.
References
N.V. Mospan, V.O. Ognevyuk, & S.S. Sysoieva, “Emergency higher education digital transformation: UKRAINE’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic”, ITLT: Information Technologies and Learning Tools, vol. 89, no 3, pp. 90–104, 2022. doi: 10.33407/itlt.v89i3.4827. (in English).
M.V. Vinichenko, M.V. Vinogradova, G.Y. Nikiporets-Takigawa, M.V. Rybakova, “The impact of the pandemic on the quality of education and the image of a university”, XLing, vol. 14, no 1, pp. 17–37, 2021. doi: 10.18355/XL.2021.14.01.02. (in English).
M. Nandy, S. Lodh, A. Tang, “Lessons from COVID-19 and a resilience model for higher education”, Ind. and Hig. Ed., vol. 35, no 1, pp. 3–9, 2021. doi: 10.1177/0950422220962696. (in English).
K. Seaborn, D. Fels, “Gamification in theory and action: A survey”, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol.74, pp. 14–31, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.006. (in English).
E. Metzger, L. Lubin, R. Patten, J. Whyte, “Applied Gamification: Creating Reward Systems for Organizational Professional Development”, Foundation of Digital Badges and Micro-Credentials, pp. 457-466, 2016. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-15425-1_25. (in English).
W. Oliveira, J. Hamari, L. Shi, A. Toda, “Tailored gamification in education: A literature review and future agenda”, Education and Information Technologies, vol. 28, pp. 1-34, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11122-4. (in English).
C. Chen, “Gamify Online Courses with Tools Built into Your Learning Management System (LMS) to Enhance Self-Determined and Active Learning”, OLC Conference Special Issue, vol. 22, no 3, pp. 41-54, 2018. doi: 10.24059/olj.v22i3.1466. (in English).
M.L. Wu, Y. Zhou, L. Li, “The effects of a gamified online course on pre-service teachers’ confidence, intention, and motivation in integrating technology into teaching”, Education and Information Technologies, 2023. doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-11727-3. (in English).
A. Bucchiarone, “Gamification and virtual reality for digital twin learning and training: architecture and challenges”, Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware, vol. 4, no 6, pp. 471-486, 2022 (in English).
N. Elmqaddem “Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality in Education. Myth or Reality”. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), vol. 14(03), 234, 2019. doi:10.3991/ijet.v14i03.9289. (in English).
R. Jason, B. Hodges “Using Virtual Reality to Support Learning: Virtual and Augmented Reality Technologies in the Classroom”. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, vol. 28(4), pp.139-145, 2019 (in English).
I. Hussain, “Pedagogical Implications of VARK Model of Learning”, Journal of Literature, Languages and Linguistics, vol. 38, pp. 33-37, 2017 (in English).
O. Bulgakova, V. Zosimov, Y. Tselm, “Educational Module for Studying PC Architecture Using 3D Technologies”, International Scientific and Technical Conference on Computer Sciences and Information Technologies, pp. 252-255, 2022. doi: 10.1109/CSIT56902.2022.10000734. (in English)
D. Kalpić, N. Hlupić, M. Lovrić, “Student’s t-Tests”, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science, 2017. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-04898-2_641 (in English).
M. Al-Kassab, “The Use of One Sample t-Test in the Real Data”, Journal of Advances in Mathematics, vol. 21, pp. 134-138, 2022 (in English).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Oleksandra S. Bulgakova, Viacheslav V. Zosimov