Abstract
The rapid integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) into educational ecosystems has introduced both opportunities and challenges. While GenAI tools such as ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude have transformed instruction, assessment, and research, they also raise critical ethical concerns, particularly among student users. These include misinformation, academic dishonesty, algorithmic bias, and diminishing student agency. Addressing these challenges requires identifying students' essential competencies to engage with AI critically and responsibly. This study investigates the skills and ethical literacies Filipino higher education students consider most important when interacting with GenAI technologies. Using a descriptive quantitative approach, 184 university students who had completed ethics- and AI-oriented workshops ranked key competencies in two domains: (1) critically assessing AI-generated content and (2) ethically using GenAI in academic contexts. The results show that students prioritize competencies related to ethical understanding, logical thinking, questioning, data verification, and accountability. These findings emphasize that students seek technical knowledge and philosophical and critical frameworks to guide their engagement with AI tools. The study contributes empirical evidence to the growing field of AI ethics in education, offering regional insight from the Philippines and highlighting gaps in curriculum design, teacher training, and institutional policy. The results support the integration of critical and ethical AI literacy into higher education curricula and suggest a foundational competency framework for responsible GenAI use. Recommendations are provided for curriculum developers, educators, and policymakers who seek to promote academic integrity and epistemic responsibility in the era of AI.
References
[1] S. Krishnamoorthy and R. Kumar, "Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Challenges and Opportunities," Harbin Engineering University Journal, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 112–125, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://harbinengineeringjournal.com/index.php/journal/article/view/4439/2474 (in English)
[2] D. Kukulska-Hulme, "Will generative AI reinvent education?" Education and Information Technologies, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1747938X2500051X (in English)
[3] G. Polizzi, "Digital Literacy and the Development of Critical Digital Consciousness: A Case Study of the Digital Skills of University Students," Journal of Media Literacy Education, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 44–60, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/102993/ (in English)
[4] W. Ng, "Can we teach digital natives digital literacy?" Computers & Education, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 1065–1078, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016. (in English)
[5] M. Paul and S. Ramachandran, "Generative AI in Education: Risks and Governance," AI and Ethics, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s43681-025-00784-8. [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-025-00784-8 (in English)
[6] E. Bender, T. Gebru, A. McMillan-Major, and S. Shmitchell, "On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big?" in Proc. 2021 ACM Conf. Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT' 21), pp. 610–623, 2021, doi: 10.1145/3442188.3445922. (in English)
[7] L. Floridi et al., "AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations," Minds and Machines, vol. 28, pp. 689–707, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5. (in English)
[8] R. Hasan and L. Yasin, "Digital Literacy in Southeast Asia," Int. J. Sci. Res., vol. 12, no. 4, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ijsr.internationaljournallabs.com/index.php/ijsr/article/view/1477 (in English)
[9] M. R. Torres et al., "Teacher Attitudes toward Generative AI," Teaching and Teacher Education, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2024.104018. (in English)
[10] J. Wei et al., "Hallucination in Large Language Models," Patterns, vol. 4, no. 3, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.cell.com/patterns/fulltext/S2666-3899(23)00043-0 (in English)
[11] F. Wong et al., "Ethics-Aware Curriculum for AI Education," Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 22, 2025, doi: 10.1186/s41239-025-00507-3. (in English)
[12] A. Manzoor et al., "Understanding Student Attitudes Toward AI," Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2025, doi: 10.1177/23294906241254786. (in English)
[13] P. Wong, "Transforming AI Literacy in Teacher Education," in Advancing AI in Learning, Springer, 2023, pp. 233–248, doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-1738-7_19. (in English)
[14] C. Dede, "AI and Education: From Content to Competence," in Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, Wiley, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781394238651.ch12 (in English)
[15] M. Lamb, "Virtue Ethics: The Role of Character in Moral Philosophy," in Ethical Explorations, MLPP, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://mlpp.pressbooks.pub/ethicalexplorations/chapter/chapter-4-virtue-ethics-the-role-of-character-in-moral-philosophy4/ (in English)
[16] C. Schmid et al., "ChatGPT in Higher Education: Impacts on Learning," Frontiers in Education, vol. 10, 2025, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1522841. (in English)
[17] D. Lee et al., "AI-Integrated Assessments: Emerging Practices," Technology in Society, vol. 78, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102664. (in English)
[18] M. Mohan et al., "Integrating ChatGPT in Learning Environments: Challenges and Prospects," in 2023 IEEE Int. Conf. Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 2023, doi: 10.1109/ICALT57829.2023.00056. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10329756 (in English)
[19] T. Yusof et al., "GenAI and the Future of Learning Design," Interactive Learning Environments, 2025, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2025.2471198. (in English)
[20] A. Smith et al., "The Role of Faculty in Promoting Responsible AI Use," Communications of the AIS, vol. 56, no. 1, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol56/iss1/7/ (in English)
[21] J. H. Falk and L. D. Dierking, Learning from Museums: Visitor Experiences and the Making of Meaning, ERIC, 2000. [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED452778 (in English)
[22] N. Abdullah, "Gamification and Ethics in AI Education," Interactive Learning Environments, 2025, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2025.2514372. (in English)
[23] C. Liu, "Teaching AI Ethics through Simulation," Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 148, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2024.107213. (in English)
[24] European Commission, "DigCompEdu: Digital Competence Framework for Educators," 2022. [Online]. Available: https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/digcompedu_en (in English)
[25] UNESCO, "AI Competency Framework for Teachers," 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/ai-competency-framework-teachers (in English)
[26] UNESCO, "Guidelines for the Ethics of AI in Education," 2023. [Online]. Available: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000388367 (in English)
[27] M. Ally, "AI and Self-Directed Learning," in AI and Education, Springer, 2020, pp. 259–274, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-45002-1_17. (in English)
[28] L. Shao et al., "Frameworks for Responsible AI Use in K-12," Discover Education, vol. 3, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590291125000269 (in English)
[29] M. Çiçek and A. Altun, "AI-Driven Learning Environments and Ethical Implications," Societies, vol. 15, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.3390/soc15010006. (in English)
[30] S. Papert, "Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas," Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 121–140, 2000. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1053482200000449 (in English)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Dave E. Marcial

