DIGITAL DATABASES FOR EDUCATION AND ABOUT EDUCATION: THE DANISH EXPERIENCE
PDF (Ukrainian)

Keywords

databases
digital databases
open databases
databases of educational data
Matched Educational Data (Denmark)

How to Cite

[1]
N. Pavlyk, N. Seiko, and S. Sytniakivska, “DIGITAL DATABASES FOR EDUCATION AND ABOUT EDUCATION: THE DANISH EXPERIENCE”, ITLT, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 1–15, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.33407/itlt.v99i1.5509.

Abstract

The article analyzes the content and specifics of Denmark's open educational electronic databases with the aim of adapting the existing Danish experience to the processes of digitization of the educational sphere in Ukraine. It was noted that these processes cover the sphere of the state policy of digitization of the educational realm (organizational, methodical, management, monitoring, accumulative mechanisms), education management (data storage to reflect the history of changes, monitoring of existing services and education quality control systems, accumulation of statistical data and their prognostic analysis), methodical support of the process of forming the digital competence of the educational process’ subjects (building information profiles, developing digital didactic subsystems, increasing the level of competitiveness of educational institutions as providers), the scientific sphere (digitalization of the open scientific environment, building a space of academic integrity, cooperation between scientists and stakeholders).

The common characteristics of the National Electronic Research and Information System URIS and the Danish educational database MED were analyzed. A vision model of the MED database (subjects of educational activity and the content of their activity) was built. The structure of monitoring the quality of education in Denmark, based on open electronic databases, is presented; it includes evaluation of the professional activity of teachers, compliance of educational programs with the social order, effectiveness of state/regional types of certification of graduates, standardization and unification of the evaluation system, mandatory regional analysis of statistical data. It was noted that the identified problems and shortcomings of computer testing of school graduates in the context of assessing the quality of their activities became a significant motivating factor for the creation of the MED database.

The conclusion was formulated that the open electronic database makes it possible to build statistically substantiated correlations between the existing social characteristics of teachers and students of all levels and types of schools. The main advantages of the created open MED database were noted: compliance with the global requirements for the assessment of the "added value of the teacher", high frequency of data collection, prognostic nature of conclusions regarding the formation of the state's educational policy.

PDF (Ukrainian)

References

L. Wei, J. Wu, and Ch. Long, “Facilitating Development of Higher Education Informatization Using Blockchain Technology”, in ICBCT'22: 4th Int. Conf. on Blockchain Technology, 2022, pp. 131−136, doi: 10.1145/3532640.3532658.

D. Berdik, S. Otoum, N. Schmidt, D. Porter, and Y. Jararweh, “A Survey on Blockchain for Information Systems Management and Security”, IPM, vol. 58, no. 1, Jan. 2021, Art. no. 102397. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102397.

F. J. García-Penalvo, “Learning Analytics as a Breakthrough in Educational Improvement,” in Radical Solutions and Learning Analytics: Personalised Learning and Teaching Through Big Data, D. Burgos, Ed., Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020, pp. 1–15. doi: 10.1007/978- 981-15-4526-9_1.

J. Breaugh, M. Rackwitz, and G. Hammerschmid, “Leadership and institutional design in collaborative government digitalisation: Evidence from Belgium, Denmark, Estonia, Germany, and the UK”, GIQ, vol. 40, no. 2, Apr. 2023, Art. no. 101788. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2022.101788.

A. Henten and T. M. Kristensen, “Information society visions in the Nordic countries”, TI, vol. 17, no. 1-2, Feb.–May. 2000, pp. 77–103. doi: 10.1016/S0736-5853(99)00028-3.

M. Falch and A. Henten, “Digital Denmark: from information society to network society”, TP, vol. 24, no. 5, Jun. 2000, pp. 377–394. doi: 10.1016/S0308-5961(00)00028-8.

K. van Kersbergen and B. Vis, “Digitalization as a policy response to social acceleration: Comparing democratic problem solving in Denmark and the Netherlands”, GIQ, vol. 39, no. 3, Jul. 2022, Art. no. 101707. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2022.101707.

T. Goldin, E. Rauch, C. Pacher, and M. Woschank, “Reference Architecture for an Integrated and Synergetic Use of Digital Tools in Education 4.0”, PCS, vol. 200, 2022, pp. 407–417. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.239.

F. Cruz-Jesus, T. Oliveira, and F. Bacao, “Exploring the Pattern between Education Attendance and Digital Development of Countries”, PT, vol. 16, 2014, pp. 452–458. doi: 10.1016/j.protcy.2014.10.112.

М. М. Косіюк, К. Е. Більовський, та В. М. Лисак, “Автоматизована інформаційна система управління закладом вищої освіти ‘Електронний університет’”, ІТЗН, вип. 93, вип. 1, сc. 96–116, Лют. 2023. doi: 10.33407/itlt.v93i1.5107.

О. Співаковський, M. Вінник, M. Полторацький, Ю. Тарасіч, та С. Омельчук, “Інформаційні технології для вимірювання якісних і кількісних показників роботи закладу вищої освіти”, ІТЗН, вип. 89, вип. 3, сc. 190–208, Чер. 2022. doi: 10.33407/itlt.v89i3.4895.

J. H. Shindo, M. M. Mjahidi, and M. D. Waziri, “Data mining algorithms for prediction of student teachers’ performance in ICT: a systematic literature review”, ІТЗН, vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 29–45, Sep. 2023. doi: 10.33407/itlt.v96i4.5246.

Т. О. Олійник, “Особливості реалізації моделей відкритої освіти майбутніх педагогів суспільно-гуманітарного профілю”, ІТЗН, вип. 87, вип. 1, cс. 236–254, Бер. 2022. doi: 10.33407/itlt.v87i1.4171.

K. Горська, O. Буров, та O. Орлюк, “Вплив медіатехнологій на цифровий освітній контент у медіасекторі”, ІТЗН, вип. 91, вип. 5, с. 84-97, Жов. 2022. doi: 10.33407/itlt.v91i5.5047.

Н. В. Мосьпан, В. O. Огнев’юк, та С. О. Сисоєва, “Надзвичайна цифрова трансформація вищої освіти: відповідь України на пандемію COVID-19”, ІТЗН, вип. 89, вип. 3, cс. 90–104, Чер. 2022. doi: 10.33407/itlt.v89i3.4827.

I. Оliinyk, Y. Bidzilya, Y. Solomin, H. Shapovalova, and H. Hetsko, “The Role of Digital Technologies in Building Research Competencies of Future Doctors of Philosophy”, JECS, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 268–284, Sep. 2023. doi: 10.15503/jecs2023.2.268.284.

M. G. A. de Castro and F. J. Garcia-Penalvo, “Successful Erasmus+ Projects: Some Case Studies”, in LCT 2022: 9th Int. Conf., HCII 2022: 24th HCI Int. Conf., 2022, Proceedings, Part I, pp.391–405, Jun. 2022. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-05657-4_28.

І. І. Драч, С. Г. Литвинова, та О. М. Слободянюк, “Досвід реалізації інституційних політик відкритої науки в європейських університетах”, ІТЗН, вип. 90, вип. 4, сc. 173–190, Вер. 2022. doi: 10.33407/itlt.v90i4.4945.

М. В. Мар’єнко, М. П. Шишкіна, та О. А. Коновал, “Методологічні засади формування хмаро орієнтованих систем відкритої науки у закладах вищої педагогічної освіти”, ІТЗН, вип. 89, вип. 3, сc. 209–232, Чер. 2022. doi: 10.33407/itlt.v89i3.4981.

“Цифрова трансформація освіти і науки”, Міністерство освіти у науки України. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://mon.gov.ua/ua/tag/cifrova-transformaciya-osviti-ta-nauki.

A. S. Nielsen and J. Bjerre, “Matched Educational Data (MED)”, in Public presentation of the database by Copenhagen Business School. Statistics Copenhagen. Denmark, Jan. 2023.

Statistics Denmark, Strategy 2025. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://www.dst.dk/en/Statistik/nyheder-analyser-publ/Publikationer/VisPub?cid=47814.

C. Shewbridge, E. Jang, P. Matthews, and P. Santiago, “OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education. Denmark”, OECD, May. 2011. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://web-archive.oecd.org/2012-06-14/96713-47696663.pdf.

A. S. Nielsen and J. Bjerre, “Matched Educational Data: Methods for matching and analysis”, in Nord Statistical Meeting (NSM), 2022.

Socioøkonomisk reference for grundskolekarakterer. Oct. 2022. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://uvm.dk/statistik/grundskolen/karakterer-og-test/sociooekonomisk-reference-for-grundskolekarakterer.

A. S. Nielsen, “Flere timer med uddannede lærere i folkeskolen”, 2021. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: www.dst.dk/da/Statistik/nyheder-analyser-publ/nyt/NytHtml?cid=46850.

J. Kühl, “Teacher value-added in Danish middle schools”, Secretariat of the Danish Economic Councils. 2023.

Kobling af lærere og fag fra kompetencedata med elever i grundskoleregistret. Danmarks Statistik. [[Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://www.dst.dk/Site/Dst/SingleFiles/GetArchiveFile.aspx?fi=4918088056&fo=0&ext=uddannelse

E. L. Hansen, Vejledning: Brug af Lærer/elevregistret, Danmarks Statistik, 2022. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://www.dst.dk/Site/Dst/SingleFiles/GetArchiveFile.aspx?fi=46793106127&fo=0&ext=uddannelse.


REFERENCES (TRANSLATED AND TRANSLITERATED)

L. Wei, J. Wu, and Ch. Long, “Facilitating Development of Higher Education Informatization Using Blockchain Technology”, in ICBCT'22: 4th Int. Conf. on Blockchain Technology, 2022, pp. 131−136, doi: 10.1145/3532640.3532658. (in English).

D. Berdik, S. Otoum, N. Schmidt, D. Porter, and Y. Jararweh, “A Survey on Blockchain for Information Systems Management and Security”, IPM, vol. 58, no. 1, Jan. 2021, Art. no. 102397. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102397. (in English).

F. J. García-Penalvo, “Learning Analytics as a Breakthrough in Educational Improvement,” in Radical Solutions and Learning Analytics: Personalised Learning and Teaching Through Big Data, D. Burgos, Ed., Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020, pp. 1–15. doi: 10.1007/978- 981-15-4526-9_1. (in English).

J. Breaugh, M. Rackwitz, and G. Hammerschmid, “Leadership and institutional design in collaborative government digitalisation: Evidence from Belgium, Denmark, Estonia, Germany, and the UK”, GIQ, vol. 40, no. 2, Apr. 2023, Art. no. 101788. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2022.101788. (in English).

A. Henten and T. M. Kristensen, “Information society visions in the Nordic countries”, TI, vol. 17, no. 1-2, Feb.–May. 2000, pp. 77–103. doi: 10.1016/S0736-5853(99)00028-3. (in English).

M. Falch and A. Henten, “Digital Denmark: from information society to network society”, TP, vol. 24, no. 5, Jun. 2000, pp. 377–394. doi: 10.1016/S0308-5961(00)00028-8. (in English).

K. van Kersbergen and B. Vis, “Digitalization as a policy response to social acceleration: Comparing democratic problem solving in Denmark and the Netherlands”, GIQ, vol. 39, no. 3, Jul. 2022, Art. no. 101707. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2022.101707. (in English).

T. Goldin, E. Rauch, C. Pacher, and M. Woschank, “Reference Architecture for an Integrated and Synergetic Use of Digital Tools in Education 4.0”, PCS, vol. 200, 2022, pp. 407–417. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.239. (in English).

F. Cruz-Jesus, T. Oliveira, and F. Bacao, “Exploring the Pattern between Education Attendance and Digital Development of Countries”, PT, vol. 16, 2014, pp. 452–458. doi: 10.1016/j.protcy.2014.10.112.(in English).

M. M. Kosiiuk, K. E. Bilovskyi, and V. M. Lysak, “Automated information management system of the institution of higher education ‘Electronic University’”, Information Technologies and Learning Tools, vol. 93, vol. 1, pp. 96–116, Feb. 2023. doi: 10.33407/itlt.v93i1.5107. (in Ukrainian).

O. Spivakovskyi, M. Vinnyk, M. Poltoratskyi, Yu. Tarasich, and S. Omelchuk, “Information technologies for measuring qualitative and quantitative performance indicators of a higher education institution”, Information Technologies and Learning Tools, vol. 89, vol. 3, pp. 190–208, Jun. 2022. doi: 10.33407/itlt.v89i3.4895. (in Ukrainian).

J. H. Shindo, M. M. Mjahidi, and M. D. Waziri, “Data mining algorithms for prediction of student teachers’ performance in ICT: a systematic literature review”, Information Technologies and Learning Tools, vol. 96, no. 4, p. 29–45, Sep. 2023. doi: 10.33407/itlt.v96i4.5246. (in English).

T. O. Oliinyk, “Peculiarities of implementation the models of open education of future social and humanitarian profile teachers”, Information Technologies and Learning Tools, vol. 87, vol. 1, pp. 236–254, Sep. 2022. doi: 10.33407/itlt.v87i1.4171. (in Ukrainian).

K. Horska, O. Burov, and O. Orliuk, “The influence of media technologies on digital educational content in the media sector”, Information Technologies and Learning Tools, vol. 91, vol. 5, pp. 84–97, Oct. 2022. doi: 10.33407/itlt.v91i5.5047. (in Ukrainian).

N. V. Mospan, V. O. Ohneviuk, and S. O. Sysoieva, “Extraordinary digital transformation of higher education: Ukraine's response to the COVID-19 pandemic”, Information Technologies and Learning Tools, vol. 89, vol. 3, pp. 90–104, Jun. 2022. doi: 10.33407/itlt.v89i3.4827. (in Ukrainian).

I. Оliinyk, Y. Bidzilya, Y. Solomin, H. Shapovalova, and H. Hetsko, “The Role of Digital Technologies in Building Research Competencies of Future Doctors of Philosophy”, JECS, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 268–284, Sep. 2023. doi: 10.15503/jecs2023.2.268.284 (in English).

M. G. A. de Castro and F. J. Garcia-Penalvo, “Successful Erasmus+ Projects: Some Case Studies”, in LCT 2022: 9th Int. Conf., HCII 2022: 24th HCI Int. Conf., 2022, Proceedings, Part I, pp.391–405, Jun. 2022. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-05657-4_28. (in English).

I. Drach, S. H. Lytvynova, and O. M. Slobodianiuk, “Experience of implementing institutional policies of open science in European universities”, Information Technologies and Learning Tools, vol. 90, vol. 4, pp. 173–190, Sep. 2022. doi: 10.33407/itlt.v90i4.4945. (in Ukrainian).

M. V. Marienko, M. P. Shyshkina, and O. A. Konoval, “Methodological principles of the formation of cloud-oriented systems of open science in institutions of higher pedagogical education”, Information Technologies and Learning Tools, vol. 89, vol. 3, pp. 209–232, Jun. 2022. doi: 10.33407/itlt.v89i3.4981. (in Ukrainian).

“Digital transformation of education and science”, The Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine. [Online]. Available: https://mon.gov.ua/ua/tag/cifrova-transformaciya-osviti-ta-nauki (in Ukrainian).

A. S. Nielsen and J. Bjerre, “Matched Educational Data (MED)”, in Public presentation of the database by Copenhagen Business School. Statistics Copenhagen. Denmark, Jan. 2023. (in English).

Statistics Denmark, Strategy 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.dst.dk/en/Statistik/nyheder-analyser-publ/Publikationer/VisPub?cid=47814 (in English).

C. Shewbridge, E. Jang, P. Matthews and P. Santiago, “OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education. Denmark”, OECD, May. 2011. [Online]. Available: https://web-archive.oecd.org/2012-06-14/96713-47696663.pdf (in English).

A. S. Nielsen and J. Bjerre. “Matched Educational Data: Methods for matching and analysis”, in Nord Statistical Meeting (NSM), 2022. (in English).

Socioøkonomisk reference for grundskolekarakterer. Oct. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://uvm.dk/statistik/grundskolen/karakterer-og-test/sociooekonomisk-reference-for-grundskolekarakterer (in Danish).

A. S. Nielsen, “Flere timer med uddannede lærere i folkeskolen”, 2021. [Online]. Available: www.dst.dk/da/Statistik/nyheder-analyser-publ/nyt/NytHtml?cid=46850 (in Danish).

J. Kühl, “Teacher value-added in Danish middle schools”, Secretariat of the Danish Economic Councils. 2023. (in English).

Kobling af lærere og fag fra kompetencedata med elever i grundskoleregistret. Danmarks Statistik. [Online]. Available: https://www.dst.dk/Site/Dst/SingleFiles/GetArchiveFile.aspx?fi=4918088056&fo=0&ext=uddannelse (in Danish).

E. L. Hansen Vejledning: Brug af Lærer/elevregistret. Danmarks Statistik. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.dst.dk/Site/Dst/SingleFiles/GetArchiveFile.aspx?fi=46793106127&fo=0&ext=uddannelse (in Danish).

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Надія Павлик, Наталія Сейко, Світлана Ситняківська

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.